Thesis cognitieve therapie

Michel Foucault's relativism is similar to Kuhn's in being based on and justified by historical researches. The domain of his studies is different, however. In works like Madness and Civilization , The Order of Things , and Discipline and Punish , Foucault tries to show how what we call "reason", "science", "knowledge" and "truth" are socially constituted and shaped by political forces. He argues that in order to pass muster as "scientific" or as "rational", a discourse must satisfy certain conditions, and these conditions are socially and historically relative, reflecting the needs and interests of existing power structures. This relativity is more obvious in the case of classifications based on distinctions such as normal-perverted, natural-unnatural, rational-insane, or healthy-sick. But Foucault suggests that it applies also to other, more epistemologically central distinctions such as scientific-unscientific, knowledge-error, and true-false. The ideal of a neutral standpoint transcending epochs and interests is thus a chimera.

They say that students live exciting lives. This is only partly true. How can one’s life be exciting if your professors team up against you every single time with dozens of assignments? An essay on history, a research paper on economics, a book review on literature in a never-ending loop? It doesn’t have to be this way you know. Paper writing should come with an interest and involvement. Otherwise, it will hardly be a success. Surveys say that 9 out of 10 people never use any knowledge, gathered in a college or university when writing research paper. This brings up an obvious question: why bother? Sleepless nights spent on writing various boring assignments should be an echo of the past. Share our insight on things? Welcome to .

Thesis cognitieve therapie

thesis cognitieve therapie


thesis cognitieve therapiethesis cognitieve therapiethesis cognitieve therapiethesis cognitieve therapie